Lorentzian Space to Euclidean Space (Really Strange Stuff)

O.k. this is strange (from the physics arxiv blog found on Slashdot):
It don’t get much weirder than this. The universe is about to lose its dimension of time says a group of theoretical astrobods at the University of Salamanca in Spain. And they got the evidence to prove it.

The idea comes from the study of braneworlds: the thinking that the universe we see around us is a 4-dimensional cosmos called a braneworld embedded in a multidimensional universe. The “signature” of our universe is the number of space and time-like dimensions it has: in our case we got 3 space-like dimensions and one time-like dimension. It’s what astrobods call a Lorentzian universe. So far so good: lots of astronutters think the same thing.

But our universe may not always have been like this. Some theorists think it may once have had a Euclidean signature meaning that all the dimensions were space-like. Now Marc “Bars” Mars and a few pals in Spain say that the Universe’s signature might be about to flip from Lorentzian to Euclidean. In other words, our dimension of time is about turn space-like. Gulp!

This ain’t entirely bonkers and here’s why. Bars Mars has calculated what it’s like to be an observer in a universe that is about to flip and get this: it would look as if it were expanding and accelerating away from us. Sound familiar?

Yep, it’s exactly what astrobods have been observin over the last few years, a phenomenon they attribute to dark energy. If Bars Mars is right, dark energy ain’t got nothing to do with it and we’re all starin’ down the barrel of a cosmic catastrophe.

Still, maybe four space-like dimensions will be better than three. Who needs time anyway?

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0710.0820: Is the Accelerated Expansion Evidence of a Forthcoming change of Signature?

http://arxivblog.com/?p=71

Bonus:

Erin Pavilina’s Dream:

Mainly catastrophic disasters like meteors, lava, tidal waves, a total shift of the planet’s alignment or something that causes the same type of reaction. Most people die, but some are taken aboard vessels and rescued.

But I’ve also seen something else. A phasing into a different dimension. It’s really hard to explain, but it was not pleasant. I want to say there was a reptilian race involved and they kept humans in this strange state of being phased between the 3rd and 4th dimensions and were feeding off our energy.

The vessels people boarded were of the “light” and the reptilian thing was definitely of the “dark” and it is unclear who will prevail.

I don’t know if this is true or not but it would make a hell of a story.

Why America Must Stay in Iraq

First off let me tell you I have never voted for ANY Bush past or present and I’m proud of that. Secondly, I did NOT agree with going to Iraq to search for fuckin’ WMDs or for OIL (operation Iraqi Liberation) or any other reason, particularly when we had allegedly been attacked by TERRORISTs not by Iraq, Iran, North Korea or any other member of the cartoonishly infamous “axis of evil”.

I do believe that there are terrorist who want to destroy America, but prior to America’s preemtive strike on Iraq they didn’t have the numbers, motives, power or news coverage that they do now. The war in Iraq has possibly made internation terrorism have a united cause.

I actually agree with 94′ Dick Cheney’s views on why it is a bad idea to take Iraq:

So why, then do I think we should stay? I see it as our responsibility to help the Iraqi people out of this chaos that was created by uprooting the structure they had in place. I am not an apologist for Saddam Hussein. I believe he was an evil man who violated the UN resolutions (a violation punishable by war, I might add). And though I think it was a VERY bad idea to unleash this “quagmire” that is now up to nearly half a trillion dollars (at a time when America itself faces a baby boomer social security disaster) we have an obligation to follow through. If we bail on the Iraqi people it will be worse than mere cowardice, it will dishonorable, heartless and above all, it will be betrayal. The same kind of betrayal that the U.S. exhibited in the Gulf War when we abandoned the Kurds and the resistance that rose up when we and many other nations stomped Saddam and got him out of Kuwait.

While I think we should stay in Iraq, I don’t buy into the AM radio, RUSH-Ditto-headed, “We have to win for OUR freedom” BULLSHIT! Its the height of arrogance to pin the successes of a stable Iraq in our hands for our own purpose when all the heavy lifting MUST be done by the Iraqi people. Yes, we will be will benefit by their stability but it is their country. We can help them attain stability, but ulimately success is in the hands of the Iraqis.

What annoys me about the Democrats and main stream liberals rhetoric is that they claim to want prosperity, health and love for everyone, but they want to bail out on the Iraqi people. I mean, yes it was wrong to go! Yes, the Bush administration sucks, but the fact is that we are there NOW and those people are suffering because of our actions.

Leaving Iraq now would be like a hit and run. We could call it “Sucker Punch” Diplomacy. It is sad that only the war mongers that flirt with a nuclear world war III (Guiliani) are the only ones who want to stay in Iraq and even they want to stay because, “We have to win for OUR freedom.”

I believe it is our moral and spiritual duty to stay in Iraq. Not for some BS religious reasons or devious political and strategic reason, but because there are people there (woman and children) who just want to live their lives.

the immigration wars

Well, spoken, man.

European laws may be stupid and pussified, but is that any reason to generalize all Muslims as fundamentalist idiots? Surely, you have one or two Muslims in Europe who don’t contemplate stoning women and blaming rape on victims.

I understand your passive aggressive indignation (we have similar BS going on it the US) but your intellect would be better served with another pinch of aperspectival objectivity (something lacking in the conservative brain).

People in the US have similar appeasement toward illegal immigrants (i.e. not enforcing the law that is in place, creating laws to make it easier for them). Naturally conservative and liberal leaders blame each other. And then contradict their alleged values by calling American citizens “racist” when they speak out.

The real problem is both sides. They both seem to have an agenda of uniting Canada/US/Mexico (it is totally denied by officials even as it is happening).

I suspect that in europe there is a similar mission of uniting all peoples.

It sounds noble but there are two problems:

1) the corrupt elite who want it (only want to control the masses like cattle)

2) People are NOT ready for it.
Particularly fundamentalist and ethnocentric people. They can not accept other cultures. Ironically, the US (as diverse as it is) is very ethnocentric.

Socially eloquent people like this make influential statesmen. Their attraction (beyond entertainment) is that they have a valid point. They are able to clearly and bravely point out that something is very wrong. But then they have a muddy perspective that can’t be bothered with critical thinking because their world is black and white with no spectrum and no shade of grey.

The masses follow like a flock of sheeple because they don’t think for themselves. Rush Limbaugh’s HUGE audience is a perfect example. They call themselves “ditto heads” because “rush is right” no matter what he says.

Linguistics and Cultural Surroundings connected

The New Yorker posted a great article about a new theory of linquistics that defies Noam Chomski‘s http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transformational_grammar as defined in his break through book, Logical Structure of Linguistic. Chomsky (the Einstien of modern linquistics) has revised his theory over the decades. But the basic premise is the same. The theory states that the way in which the human brain creates meaning is instinctual. As such, all of the world’s languages must have the same basic structure. The most fundamental part of this universal structure is the ability to make recursive sentences – the ability to string many different beads of thought into one large continuous bead of thought. For example: The hat is red. The man is wearing a hat. AND IN MOST LAGUAGES YOU CAN THEN TAKE THAT SENTENCE AND SAY: The man is wearing a red hat.

Then came Dan Everett. Dan has been interacting with an isolated Brazilian tribe known as the Pirahã who don’t fit into Chomskian theory. They don’t use their language recursively. So it can be argued that it is not their brains that have shaped the structure of their language but the culture that shapes language. Could this be true of every person?

Dan Everett’s theory reminds me of what Ken Wilber says about how much influence our culture has over how we interpret reality. There is nothing to fear as far as Chomsky being wrong… That is the beauty of science. Newton was right about gravity but Einstein’s theories explain certain things that Newtons classic view of the universe can not. And now modern physics theories can explain some things that Einstein’s view could not.

Chomsky’s theories are providing a look into how the brain processes language and our innate ability to concoct meaning from the words we create while Everett’s theory introduces the impact that culture has in shaping our language.

New America: Solar Storms are Coming

Currently there is a controvery over ”Global Warming”.  Most scientist agree that the weather is changing and the temperature on Earth will increase over the next century by 3 degrees.  In America, this has become a huge political issue as politicians like Al Gore have stepped up to the plate with movies like “An Inconvenient Truth”.  The main debate is whether humanity is the primary contributing factor in Global Warming and if we as a people should take more actions to change it.  With the amount of pollution and waste we produce in and around our cities this should be a debate at all.

While there is no doubt in my mind that humanity has had a MAJOR impact on the Earth and her ecosystem, the coming changes may well be completely beyond our control. 

New America & New World Changes 

20 May 07, I was listening to a very interesting radio show on AM’s third most listend to conservative talk show, Glenn Beck.  Even though I tend to disagree with many of the oppinions of Rush, Hannity and Micheal Savage, I love talk radio because it is one of the last (dwindling) bastions of free speech.  And even these guys tend to be puppets of the Republican party.  

Glenn had a man whose name I don’t recall (Dr. Mike Lynn?) on his show who, in addition to insightful thoughts about the current Immigrations issue (amnesty of illegal imigrant), he mentioned something about the comming three nation highway meshing with the ”new map of America.” 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

He also talked about TRM technical remote viewing and was roasted by Glenn Beck but I was more interested in this New map idea.  Anyway, this stuff is really interesting to me because it seems to keep coming up.  Not so much the map, but visions of impending doom for millions of people and not just from ”psychics” and remote viewer (see Ed Dames Killshot) predicting cataclysmic disasters around 2012, but now even from NASA.  They predict massive solar flares by 2012.  

Solar Storms

“Who’s right? Time will tell. Either way, a storm is coming.” NASA

 According to scientists, the sun has a “conveyor belt” of electrically charged gases that cycle on the surface and deep within the sun.  http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2006/10mar_stormwarning.htm 

When the belt is turning “fast,” it means that lots of magnetic fields are being swept up, and that a future sunspot cycle is going to be intense. This is a basis for forecasting: “The belt was turning fast in 1986-1996,” says Hathaway. “Old magnetic fields swept up then should re-appear as big sunspots in 2010-2011.” (NASA)

Like most experts in the field, Hathaway has confidence in the conveyor belt model and agrees with Dikpati that the next solar maximum should be a doozy. But he disagrees with one point. Dikpati’s forecast puts Solar Max at 2012. Hathaway believes it will arrive sooner, in 2010 or 2011. (NASA)

Will this solar max do anything to the Earth’s Magnetosphere severe enough to cause a cataclysm?  Perhaps this has something to do with the end of the Mayan calendar which just happends to end 2012. 

The Flesh Colored Crayon of Reality

 The first box of Binney & Smith crayons, produced in 1903, sold for a nickel and contained eight colors: red, orange, yellow, green, blue, violet, brown, and black (wiki). 

Over the decades, Crayola expanded into many other colors including colors like Indian Red and “flesh” colored.  These two colors were fine through the 1950′s.  The multi-cultural movements of the ’60s changed everything. 

In 1962, Binney & Smith chose to change the name Flesh to Peach in response to the Civil Rights Movement, since not all people are the same skin color. In 1999, the name Indian Red was changed to Chestnut because children wrongly perceived the color to be that of Native Americans, when in fact “Indian Red” had its roots in a dye from India (wiki).

When it comes to interpreting life, we tend to color our experiences with the tools we have.  It makes sense, really.  Afterall, we can’t use something we don’t have and we can’t use information we don’t know.

That is an over-simplified explaination of postmodernist view on science and philosophy.  Postmodernist ask: How can scientists, philosophers and saints know anything when their culture dilutes what they call reality?  These philosophers, and saints and scientists are essentially coloring reality with their flesh colored crayons.  Now, the extreme postmodernist jump straight off of a nilhist cliff and says there is no meaning at all.  I agree with some of what the post moderist have to say, but there is no need to be ridiculous.

It is important to at least realize the cultural bias we use to interpret our Gods, our facts and our reason.  Without that internal check  we will be blinded by the very things that are supposed to free us.

Further, it is important to realize that every word spoken and written and every concept thought or otherwise expressed are merely symbols.  In the case of “God” or “Jehovah” or “Allah” we should note that the words we used to describe the subject of our worship, love, devotion and adoration are only symbols. 

We tend to feel threatend by someone else’s interpretation of reality when in wisdom all interpretations should strengthen us as they tell us more about ourselves as individuals and as a species.  An atheist (for example) shouldn’t be disgusted by a Pentacostal speaking in tongues but be awakend to the spectrum of reality that the human condition can accept.  Reality does not have a cookie cutter approach.  What I see, is not completely what you see.  

Though we should not praise ALL perspectives (they are not all healthy and contructive) we should definitely respect them enough to deal with them properly.  Just like a criminal profiler, they must understand and get into the mind set of a killer in order to predict the predators next move and motive.  In the same way, should we understand our enemies and those who seek to despitefully use us.  It does no good to simply marginalize and use stereotyping beyond what is necessary.

Another example is George Bush saying of Al Quaeda, “they hate us because of our freedom” may be bit oversimplified.  The more we understand the terrorist, the child molester, serial killer, the rapist, the dirty politician, the better chance we have to overcome and subdue them.  A game of Chess is won by paying attention, thinking three steps a head of your opponents most probable movements.  

In the latter part of the 19th century after two world wars and an precedented population explosion, we found ourselves in the waiting arms of multiculturalism and globalism.  Its forced us to live in a world of dying closed homogenious cultures and vanishing nations. 

As with the mythological phoenix, the new firebird will rise out of the ashes of old.  Now we are forced to draw reality not only in new colors but in different dimensions.  

 

 

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (entrainment 2.0?)

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation is the next step in the evolution of entrainment.  Instead of using sounds to influence brainwaves, it uses noninvasive electromagnetism. 

Sound entrainment has been used to coax brainwaves into a certain pattern. 

If a tuning fork designed to produce a frequency of 440 Hz is struck (causing it to oscillate) and then brought into the vicinity of another 440 Hz tuning fork, the second tuning fork will begin to oscillate. The first tuning fork is said to have entrained the second or caused it to resonate. The physics of entrainment apply to biosystems as well. Of interest here are the electromagnetic brain waves. — Science of Binaural Beats Brainwave Entrainment

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) is the application of variable magnetic fields to the brain — Open-rTMS 

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation is a VERY effective way to induce states of consciousness:

BBC article on Dr. Persinger’s TMS helmet 

How does Dr Persinger induce artificially religious experiences in his patients?

Dr Persinger has designed a helmet that produces a very weak rotating magnetic field of between ten nanotesla and one microtesla over the temporal lobes of the brain. This is placed on the subject’s head and they are placed in a quiet chamber while blindfolded. So that there is no risk of ‘suggestion’, the only information that the subjects are given is that they are going in for a relaxation experiment. Neither the subject nor the experimenter carrying out the test has any idea of the true purpose of the experiment. In addition to this, the experiment is also run with the field switched both off and on. This procedure Dr Persinger claims will induce an experience in over 80% of test subjects.

What sort of experiences do subjects report?

This is very dependent on the belief system of the individual subjects [ADDED Wilber-Combs Lattice]. Dr Persinger talks about his subjects feeling a ‘sensed presence’ – feeling that somebody was in the chamber with them. Subjects who are strongly religious are likely to interpret this presence as god. Whereas, atheists may also report a ‘sensed presence’ but attribute the phenomena to a trick of brain chemistry, perhaps comparable to when they have taken drugs in the past.

TMS is so effective that “Among more sensitive individuals, tests show that their skin will turn red if they believe a hot nickel has been placed on their hand. That’s a powerful psychosomatic effect of the brain on the body. Suppose we could make it more precise?” — This is Your Brain on God, Wired.  

TMS is currently in the hands of reductionists who believe that ALL mystical experiences can be summed up by electromagnetic disturbances.  Mass sightings up UFOs and other strange phenomenon are simply chemicals in our brains being influenced by electromagnetism.  

Perhaps inducing certain electromagnetic frequencies allows our biominds to access a perspective of reality we would not have otherwise been privy too without years of meditation.  Like devices that allow us to see infrared (frequencies that are beyond our normal domain of visible light), perhaps getting to certain states of consciousness allow us to “see” things we are normally oblivious too.    

Science and religion used to fully subscribe to a flat earth the was the center of a static universe.  We have found the complete opposite to be true.  Modern mainstream scientists now agree that we are likely the only sentient life and there are no subtle spiritual type energies and all spiritual experiences are completely the product of the human brain.  All of that seems just as ridiculous as a ”flatworld” theory.  A neo-atheistic reductionism is fine as belief systems and religions go, but what I don’t like is how science marginalizes anyone outside of their mainstream belief structure. 

I love science but its champions seem to have fallen prey to a dogma that is similar in close minded stagnancy to that of some religious denominations.       

TMS links:

BioMag – TMS reasearch

This is your Brain on God, Wired. 7-11-1999

God Helmet, Shakti

 

Mystical Experience and Interpretation (the W-C Lattice at a glance)

“I am an empirical spiritualist because the only way one can know truth is by experience. Observing with our eyes, sensing with our intuition, feeling with our emotions: these are all necessary parts of discerning truth. We must trust them. That is how God communicates with us, by providing emotional, visual and intuitive information qued to the empirical experiences of nature.” — Center for Unhindered Living

This is similar to how I feel about how to attain “truth”.  Some would immediately discount things like “out of body experiences” and even lucid dreams as having little or no value and then call themselves “scientists”.  A real scientist looks for proof prior to making hasty assumptions about what is and is not probable/possible. 

On the other hand, I don’t instantly believe or agree with everything I hear preached in the pulpit  or claimed in books.  I like to experience things for myself (if possible) prior to making an assumption.

Jesus, Buddha and other enlightened beings actually had direct contact and experience.  Their teachings have been taken and interpreted by the masses and the results have been social stability at best and subversive population and resource control and manipulation at worse.

The problem with Direct Experience: Interpretation 

Because interpretation plays such a huge part in how we use what we know, I don’t believe that even direct experience is a “cure all” for the current human condition.  Anyone can have a phenomenological experience, and their interpretation of that experience will be based on their current psychological-sociological (and unfortunately pathological) stage. 

 

How a person interprets those experiences can be seen in the Wilber-Combs Lattice:

The lattice shows the spiritual/religious belief level (or type of belief) a person can have ranging from Archaic to Integral (this is taken from James Fowler’s research on stages of faith).  The top of the W-C Lattice shows the type of phenomenological experience a person can have.

A person at an Archaic level can have a phenomenological experience (i.e. feel a holy presence, feel one with all things ect), however their interpretation of the experience will be much difference than someone at say and Integral level.  A person on the lower end of the W-C Lattice might come away from an experience of oneness and suddenly think that they are a Messiah or even God. 

So a person such as Vernon Wayne Howell (a.k.a David Koresh), may have indeed had visions, however the interpretation is determined by the psychological make up of the individual.  Vernon’s beliefs and vision (an alleged phenomenological experience he had while on a trip to Israel) guided him to take control of the Branch Davidian Seventh-day Adventists, break a bunch of federal laws and get subsequently killed by the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (BATF) when the Branch Davidian compound was raided. 

*There are many variables that can be considered which led up to the terrible tragedy that took the lives of 70+ victims (including children), and I won’t disrespect these people by claiming that faith and religion had everything to do with their deaths.  For one, there were alot of mistakes made by the U.S. government.

From a different Perspective

When ever we have experiences it is imperative that we keep them in context.  Merely keeping all phenomenological experiences in perspective (this doesn’t at all mean ignoring them or devaluing them) we can have the wisdom on how to act.  Having perspective means acknowledging biases, assumptions and psychological/physical make up that come from our social upbringing and genetics.  Unfortunately, this is a big hurdle for many religious traditions as they claim exclusive rights to all truth and perspectives leaving no room for evaluation and questions. 

Pathological disorders and phenomenological experiences are a whole different ball game.  The truly ignorant would put both in the same category (very 18th century “lets lobotomize and shock everyone until they think like us” kind of dogma).

The Metaphor of the Nautilus @ Beyond Religion

The Metaphor of the Nautilus

[from "about us" page of Beyond Religion]

Oliver Wendell Holmes, a century and a half ago, saw the metaphorical significance of the chambered home of the Nautilus. These fascinating seashells are spiral in shape and consist of a series of ever-larger chambers in each of which the sea creature lives for a season until it outgrows that particular space. The Nautilus then enlarges its shell by the addition of a new chamber suitable for the next stage of its life.     image from Bert Martin Fine Art Photography Holmes wrote, in a poem entitled The Chambered Nautilus, “Build thee more stately mansions, O my soul….Let each new temple, nobler than the last, Shut thee from heaven with a dome more vast, Till thou at length art free, Leaving thine outgrown shell by life’s unresting sea!”

more at Beyond Religion

The spiral is one of the most fundamental and beautiful parts of evolution:

Here it is in the development of the the human psyche: Spiral Dynamics (the name is indicative of the evolutionary, sequential growth the a persons “world views”.

It can be seen in everything from DNA to the formation of galaxies.  

 

Integral Hacking: Developing Jedi Mind Tricks at DEFCON

“To the weak I became weak, that I might win the weak; I have become all things to all men that I may by all means save some.” 1 Corinthians 9:22

How does a 60 year old former Episcopal priest manage to captivate a packed audience of tech savvy red teens, ambitiously orange “20-something” hackers, amber security professionals, and green information freedom hacktivists while speaking about nothing technical at DEFCON, the world largest hacker convention?  Richard Thieme, author of Islands in the Click Stream, has been able to do this since DEFCON 4, 1996 (1). 

There is a body of knowledge growing like a fungus in the cracks of the burgeoning technological super fortress that is the information age.  Hacking is that fungi and the DEFCON hacker convention is the petri dish where this new organism is cultivated.  Like penicillin, this mold can be used for good.  This culture is growing tendrils beyond cyberspace and into the human mind.   Complex systems and technologies are synergizing toward an integral hacking solution now pushing humanity into new levels of communication by slipping passed the psychological firewalls to communicate on a deeper level with kick ass Jedi mind tricks.  Prepare for psychological nudity!

At DEFCON 14, Richard Thieme’s subject was “Beyond Social Engineering: Tools for Reinventing Yourself” in which he discussed how to “manage multiple modular identities” then link them into a seamless life by leveraging them with an intimate knowing of the true inner self (2).  The auditorium was crammed with wide-eyed technophiliacs at the edge of their seats.

Even though Thieme freely admits to not having any discernable technical hacking skills he is able to successfully “hack” (a.k.a socially engineer) his way into a very elitist, and young and mostly apathetic counter-culture.  He is an Integral Hacker.

The same skills used naturally by Mr. Thieme are used by integral leaders like Brett Thomas, co-founder of the Stagen Leadership Institute, to recognize a person’s worldview, determine what stage of development they are likely to identify with and then communicated with them on that level (4).  An integralist would call this “skillful means” but hackers call it a subtle form of social engineering.  Social engineering has a slightly negative connotation as it is usually associated with manipulation rather than enhanced communication. 

As a complete method of hacking people, integral hacking goes way beyond mere social engineering and into Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) techniques.  This subject was also discussed at DEFCON 14.  Brad Smith of Computer Institute of the Rockies discussed how law enforcement, FBI and other three letter agencies use NLP during interviews and interrogations (2).  Full spectrum people hacking would include all of the NLP “physiological lock picking” techniques to get full access the root of ego.

Past DEFCON speakers touching on the outer reaches of wetware and integral hacking have included Thieme’s, “Hacking a Trans-Planetary Net” which touched on the need for hacking to include “an artist’s imagination, an obsessive hunger for knowledge, and a deep understanding of cyborg humanity” (1).  Former hacker Susan Thunder spoke on “Social Engineering and Psychological Subversion of Trusted Systems” which was about infiltrating a company without physical or digital access (3).  People are the weakest part of any secure network.

Hackers are the gun slingers of the Wild, Wild Web, living in a world of 20 year old millionaires who have already change the world and actual evil genius’ who are drifting ghosts pilfering the pockets of the ignorant weak.  Whether their intentions are holistic or selfish all hackers view ignorance as the greatest sin.  The DEFCON prides itself on a borderline dangerous freedom that is fertile ground of both immeasurable brilliance and debauchery of the filthiest sort.  It’s the frothiest edge of technological mayhem and creativity.  It is on the fringes of every digital-civilizations’ decomposing structures that you will find a culture of complex integral hackers of hardware, software or wetware growing and sending out spores.   

 

 

References

 

1. DEFCON. (July 28, 1999). DEFCON 4 Archive. Retrieved November 18, 2006, from http://defcon.org

2. DEFCON. (August 6, 2006). DEFCON 14. Retrieved November 18 2006,
from http://defcon.org

3. DEFCON. (July 28, 1999). DEFCON 3 Archive. Retrieved November 18, 2006, from http://defcon.org

4. Integral Leadership Review. Biography of Brett Thomas. Retrieved November 18, 2006,

http://www.integralleadershipreview.com

Thieme Works. (2001). Keynotes, Workshops and Retreats. Retrieved November 18 2006,
from http://www.thiemeworks.com

« Previous Page — Next Page »