
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Source of Miracles &#187; evolution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sourceofmiracles.com/tags/science/evolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sourceofmiracles.com</link>
	<description>stop seeking.  what you are looking for is looking through you :)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 16:10:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>the day magic dies</title>
		<link>http://sourceofmiracles.com/the-day-magic-dies/</link>
		<comments>http://sourceofmiracles.com/the-day-magic-dies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 21:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>elamb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postmodern mythology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postmodernism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sourceofmiracles.com/the-day-magic-dies/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.” &#8212; Arthur C. Clarke, &#8220;Profiles of The Future&#8221;, 1961 (Clarke&#8217;s third law) One day technology will seem more magical than the myth of magic. In fact, the very idea of magical power will seem weak, unimaginative and one dimensional compared to what is ahead. It will be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.” &#8212;  Arthur C. Clarke, &#8220;Profiles of The Future&#8221;, 1961 (Clarke&#8217;s third law)</p>
<p>One day technology will seem more magical than the myth of magic.  In fact, the very idea of magical power will seem weak, unimaginative and one dimensional compared to what is ahead.  It will be the faded equivalent of a 100,000 year old print of a hand on a wall.  Things that we cannot yet imagine are just beyond the horizon.</p>
<p>From our current early 21st century understanding looking at future progress, physical reality itself will be the tool of choice commanded at the whim of awareness.  Religion and myth will be cherished ornaments and magic will be replaced with a series of unfathomable miracles seemingly from nowhere.  I could call this miracle science, math, or technology but our current ideas of what those things are will not apply; for it is something closer to what magic is supposed to be.</p>
<p>Only futurists, inventors and brilliant mathmeticians have been able to catch a glimpse of the coming revolution.  Some have been driven mad by its implications (ted kazinski), some driven to fear the future and others call it the Singularity (Ray Kurzweil).</p>
<p>Technological Singularity &#8211; The technological singularity is a theoretical future point of unprecedented technological progress, caused in part by the ability of machines to improve themselves using artificial intelligence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sourceofmiracles.com/the-day-magic-dies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When the singularity comes, infinity will be our collective bitch!</title>
		<link>http://sourceofmiracles.com/when-the-singularity-comes-infinity-will-be-our-collective-bitch/</link>
		<comments>http://sourceofmiracles.com/when-the-singularity-comes-infinity-will-be-our-collective-bitch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 04:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>elamb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[god]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postmodernism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quantum physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unbound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[singularity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sourceofmiracles.com/when-the-singularity-comes-infinity-will-be-our-collective-bitch/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If human consciousness can really leave the body and operate without a brain then everything we know in neuroscience has to be questioned. If people could really gain paranormal knowledge then much of physics needs to be rewritten. This is what is at stake. Add to that the fact that most people in the population [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If human consciousness can really leave the body and operate without a brain then everything we know in neuroscience has to be questioned. If people could really gain paranormal knowledge then much of physics needs to be rewritten. This is what is at stake. Add to that the fact that most people in the population believe in some kind of life after death, and many desperately want it to be true, then you have a strong case for this research – even if the chances of success are vanishingly small. &#8212; Susan Blackmore (<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/sep/19/health.mentalhealth">guardian</a>)</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>I&#8217;ve got great news!!</strong>  Science now knows for an absolute fact that we are the only intelligent life in the universe (so we are the center of the known universe), there is absolutely NOTHING faster than the speed of light, we know the exact moment of the big bang, there is no God, and you have no &#8220;soul&#8221;.  Isn&#8217;t that awesome!  There are no mysteries!</p>
<p>Whoo-hoo!  Now I can sleep at night.  All knowledge has been acquired.. our quest it over.  Charles Darwin &#038; Einstein figured it all out so we can now build churches in their names.  ha!</p>
<p>All sarcasm aside, as awesome as science is We (the human race) don&#8217;t know shit!  We really really don&#8217;t.  We don&#8217;t even know 1% of shit.  </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t jump to conclusions, I am not a creationist and I don&#8217;t&#8217; subscribe exclusively to any ONE religion or philosophy.  I am someone who believes that there is some value in religion, philosophy and science.  I respect and use each of their strengths in all parts of my life where they are relevant (i.e. I don&#8217;t use science to help me explain philosophy or religion to help me explain how light works.</p>
<p>The great thing about science is that is grows and evolves despite the conservative establishment that see it as some sort of dogma.  What I like about science is that it gets better.  The theories no matter how great continue to develop the complexity and order needed to describe more of what we do know.  Intrepid mavericks like Galileo, Descarte, Newton and Einstein challenge the status quo and go off the beaten path and into the previously unknown.</p>
<p>I think there are a lot of unexplained phenomenon that deserves our full attention and funding.  One thing that bothers me about mainstream scientists is there dogmatic response to the improbable.  It makes them sound as one-dimensionally boxed in as your average religious fundamentalist.</p>
<p>I suppose we all have our limits of what we can accept as real.  Even Einstein fought the fundamental (probabilistic) ideas of quantum mechanics that are now not only fully accepted but proven and used. </p>
<p>For me the mystery is the beauty of our 99.999999 percent unknown universe.  The conquest of each piece of this infinity puzzle is pure orgasmic rapture.  </p>
<p>To that unknown, I say bring it on!  When the singularity comes, infinity will be our collective bitch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sourceofmiracles.com/when-the-singularity-comes-infinity-will-be-our-collective-bitch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Science of the Soul? ‘I Think, Therefore I Am’ Is Losing Force</title>
		<link>http://sourceofmiracles.com/science-of-the-soul-%e2%80%98i-think-therefore-i-am%e2%80%99-is-losing-force/</link>
		<comments>http://sourceofmiracles.com/science-of-the-soul-%e2%80%98i-think-therefore-i-am%e2%80%99-is-losing-force/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 04:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>elamb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sourceofmiracles.com/science-of-the-soul-%e2%80%98i-think-therefore-i-am%e2%80%99-is-losing-force/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[here is a cool article from the NYtimes. Its good to see people with a different idea about the human soul and evolution: “Evolutionary biology shows the transition from animal to human to be too gradual to make sense of the idea that we humans have souls while animals do not,” wrote Dr. Murphy, an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>here is a cool article from the NYtimes.  Its good to see people with a different idea about the human soul and evolution:</p>
<ul>
“Evolutionary biology shows the transition from animal to human to be too gradual to make sense of the idea that we humans have souls while animals do not,” wrote Dr. Murphy, an ordained minister in the Church of the Brethren. “All the human capacities once attributed to the mind or soul are now being fruitfully studied as brain processes — or, more accurately, I should say, processes involving the brain, the rest of the nervous system and other bodily systems, all interacting with the socio-cultural world.”</p>
<p>Therefore, she writes, it is “faulty” reasoning to want to distinguish people from the rest of creation. She and Dr. Haught cite the ideas of Thomas Aquinas, the 13th-century philosopher and theologian who, Dr. Haught said, “spoke of a vegetative and animal soul along with the human soul.”</p>
<p>“Everything we know about the biological sciences says that life is a phenomenon of physics and chemistry, and therefore the notion of some sort of spirit to animate it and give the flesh a life really doesn’t fit with modern science,” said Dr. Miller, a Roman Catholic whose book, “Finding Darwin’s God” (Harper, 1999) explains his reconciliation of the theory of evolution with religious faith. “However, if you regard the soul as something else, as you might, say, the spiritual reflection of your individuality as a human being, then the theology of the soul it seems to me is on firm ground.”</ul>
<p>NYTimes Article, &#8220;<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/26/science/26soul.html?ex=1340596800&#038;en=622b888d9939f8ec&#038;ei=5124&#038;partner=digg&#038;exprod=digg">Science of the Soul?</a>..&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sourceofmiracles.com/science-of-the-soul-%e2%80%98i-think-therefore-i-am%e2%80%99-is-losing-force/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
